Peer Review (2)-Definition Essay

This time around since I took into consideration the number of mistakes I made on the last paper, I tried to make this essay better. However, it didn't turn out quite as I planned because of the fact I had to twist around the topic I was considering for this paper. Even though, my partners did give me constructive criticism on how to fix the paper and make it work, it just wasn't enough. I did get good feedback about the topic since there is many examples I can use to drag my message across, but I need to really work on my sentence structure and grammar. This time, reading wasn't a real concern involved in this paper, but you really needed to understand the definition clearly that you would be always to transition the idea smoothly in your paper. The teacher's consideration was moderately used, although, in the end it was up to me to fix this paper and come up with something brilliant. I never thought that this was going to be easy, nor did I thought this was going to be more challenging. I think what needs to be improved of this is the method in which we are reviewing each other. Because we don't correct each other enough or have the capability of knowing our mistakes, is why sometimes our papers fail to give the message we want to send across to the audience. We are ok in the sense of peer editing each other, but we need to 'up the ante' on editing so we can improve our writing.